纽约夜月情 HD中字

评分:
1.0 很差

分类:喜剧片 美国 1993

导演:沃伦·莱特   

剧情介绍

片名:纽约夜月情

关键词:纽约夜月情免费在线观看

电影类别:喜剧片

发行年份:1993

首映地区:美国

导演:沃伦·莱特

演员:Matthew,Broderick,Jeanne,Tripplehorn,Tim,Guinee

更新时间:2024-05-12 17:00

《纽约夜月情》讲述的是什么故事?

  Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.'
  By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses.
  Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together.
  One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature: he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around.
  While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next: the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with his/her partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken.
  Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...

10、《纽约夜月情》是哪一年上映的?

《纽约夜月情》是沃伦·莱特于1993年拍摄的一部经典喜剧片。此片开创美国当代喜剧片的先河,《纽约夜月情》上映时票房稳坐前三,创下当年纪录。当时Matthew,Broderick,Jeanne,Tripplehorn,Tim,Guinee均为最佳主角,Matthew,Broderick,Jeanne,Tripplehorn,Tim,Guinee以精彩演技和突出形象,奠定在美国影坛地位。Matthew,Broderick,Jeanne,Tripplehorn,Tim,Guinee饰演角色造型多年后仍为人所模仿。沃伦·莱特之前曾被人怀疑其能力,而《纽约夜月情》却奠定沃伦·莱特电影风格。《纽约夜月情》首映时曾获海外喜剧片和媒体广泛称誉,被认为其优秀程度,是足以与同时期(指1980年代)好莱坞(好莱坞)优秀喜剧片齐名。

11、被称为喜剧片的开先河之作的《纽约夜月情》,是沃伦·莱特最好的作品吗?

从沃伦·莱特斩获喜剧片最佳导演 我就觉得这部《纽约夜月情》是他最好的电影。虽然沃伦·莱特后来还拍出来了评价特别好的电影,但是《纽约夜月情》是他电影的代表作品。

12、《纽约夜月情》为什么可以成为经典?

提起美国电影,人们就肯定会说出《纽约夜月情》的名字。这部由沃伦·莱特导演,Matthew,Broderick,Jeanne,Tripplehorn,Tim,Guinee主演的《纽约夜月情》,在当时,真的是成为了一匹黑马,杀出了一条血路,创造了一个奇迹。为何会这么说,我想,就连沃伦·莱特导演和Matthew,Broderick,Jeanne,Tripplehorn,Tim,Guinee,都没想到这部喜剧片会得到这样好的反响。沃伦·莱特先生曾说过,这是一群失意的人凑到了一起创作出来的一部作品。因为在《纽约夜月情》开拍之前,Matthew,Broderick,Jeanne,Tripplehorn,Tim,Guinee已经有4年无戏可拍,而Matthew,Broderick,Jeanne,Tripplehorn,Tim,Guinee主演的电影,票房始终不理想,这样的几个人凑在了一起,也真是缘分!所以,正是这样的失意感和强烈的自尊心,他们在电影中投入的热情,是我们难以想象的,其实《纽约夜月情》中的人物心理历程和感人的剧情,何尝不是现实中他们的真实写照呢?所以,他们怀着一腔心有不甘的英雄气,用他们的实力和人情成就了这部经典喜剧片,也成就了他们自己!

21、如何评价《纽约夜月情》?

《纽约夜月情》口碑非常好深受广大观众喜爱,《纽约夜月情》一经播放立刻引来无数人点赞,不仅Matthew,Broderick,Jeanne,Tripplehorn,Tim,Guinee演的好而且该电影故事情节也非常紧凑,德龙影院(http://www.tsdelong.com)观看起来特别流畅同时还能扣人心弦,虽然目前《纽约夜月情》收视率一般但是该片目前受欢迎程度已经名列前茅。该剧主演Matthew,Broderick,Jeanne,Tripplehorn,Tim,Guinee,她在该剧中的演技可圈可点,受到Matthew,Broderick,Jeanne,Tripplehorn,Tim,Guinee演的好而且该电影迷的认可。

27、《纽约夜月情》电影的主要内容

《纽约夜月情》是一部喜剧片电影,由导演:沃伦·莱特执导,主演:Matthew,Broderick,Jeanne,Tripplehorn,Tim,Guinee,

  Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.'
  By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses.
  Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together.
  One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature: he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around.
  While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next: the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with his/her partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken.
  Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...

猜你喜欢

评论加载中...
加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved